Virginia Woolf
wrote in 1929:
“I told you in
the course of this paper that Shakespeare had a sister; but do not look for her
in Sir Sidney Lee’s life of the poet. She died young – alas, she never wrote a
word… she lives in you and me, and in many other women who are not here
tonight, for they are washing up the dishes and putting the children to bed.”
Nearly 90 years
later, the work of finding those women whose lives sit beneath the surface of
our collective cultural memory is still ongoing. Projects such as Finding
Ada and WikiProject Women Artists are organized, strategic efforts to
rewrite history to include the contribution of women in science and the arts,
both in the past, and in contemporary culture. However, such strategic efforts,
because of the structure of Wikipedia, which emphasizes the validity of
secondary sources over primary sources;and influenced heavily by what historical
sources are easily available, digitized, creative commons licensed, and in
English; are often Eurocentric, focusing on restoring the histories of white
middle class women.
This is
particularly true of efforts in the sciences, where the names of Ada Lovelace,
Mary Anning, Hedy Lamarr, Rosalind Franklin have become a kind of code of their
own, a indicator of taking women in science seriously, because they’ve been
mentioned, their hidden stories revealed. While revising the history of science
to recognize the contributions of women is hugely important, this work must be intersectional.
That is, it must seek to move beyond a reliance on written, secondary sources
as valid evidence for an individual’s inclusion as a Wikipedia entry or other
easily accessible resource. In the interim, the work people are doing to write
and develop excellent, thoroughly researched, and community-embedded secondary
sources which examine the historical impact of women of colour or indigenous
women provides opportunity for these women’s histories to be made official –
googleable. (The work of decolonizing the algorithms needs to be done also.)
Hidden Figures, both the 2016 book by Margot Lee
Shetterly, and the 2016 film, based on Shetterly’s book and directed by
Theodore Melfi, does much to counter this focus on restoring women’s history
being about white women. In a popular account which glosses over the Civil
Rights Movement and touches only briefly on equal pay, the film centres the
brilliance, wit, bravery, and humanity of Katherine G. Johnson,
Mary Jackson, and Dorothy Vaughan
– and in doing so centres and valorizes the communities and families which
produced and supported them, a powerful counternarrative to contemporary depictions
of black lives, such as the easy way in which Trump so recently dismissed Senator John Lewis with words that equated
‘Black/urban/crime-ridden/rundown’.
Hidden Figures celebrates the essential contributions of
Johnson, Jackson, and Vaughan – the scene in which Dorothy Vaughan, who has
taught herself Fortran with the help of a book she was forced to steal from the
public library as it was in the whites-only section, gets the IBM supercomputer
going, to the shock of the IBM men who have been trying to do this for weeks –
is deeply, viscerally, satisfying; as is the sheer brilliance of Johnson’s
maths, calculating the go/no-go landing zone for John Glenn’s successful orbit
of the Earth. Mary Jackson too, who fought so hard to be the first
African-American woman engineer at NASA, doing night classes in a segregated
high school where the instructor tells her that the examples haven’t been
designed for women. Johnson, running in her dress-code mandated high heels
across the Langley campus, reminding me of the quip about Ginger Rogers, who
did everything the same as Fred Astaire, except ‘backwards, in high heels.’
But the film
also, searingly, reminds us, the audience, of all the people whose
contributions might never get to be made, if science, society, does not
dismantle the structures of patriarchy, racism, colonization, imperialism,
ableism. Imagine if all the other geniuses could take their rightful place.*
*With thanks to
@niais (Dr Sarah Tuttle) from whose tweet this phrase comes: https://twitter.com/niais/status/517520415132889088
Suggested further
reading:
Dr Chanda
Prescod-Weinstein’s excellent Decolonizing
Science reading list is a fantastic starting point
Essential reading
for anyone interested in the project to decolonize our academies is Professor
Linda Tuhiwai-Smith’s Decolonizing
Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
No comments:
Post a Comment