Tim Hunt reckons that women ruin labs with
their crying, and, to be honest, I have to admit that tears are usually my
response to the minor and major incidences of sexism that permeate academia.
I’m not crying today. I am incandescent
with rage, hands shaking as I try to type this. A woman I know – a woman I love
and respect, who works incredibly hard and whose contribution to her
discipline, and to science at large, is immense. This woman is quitting. She
has been hounded out by bullying, childish petty behaviour, and sexism. She has
been failed by those whose positions within her institution mean that they are
responsible for the pastoral care of staff. People have turned a blind eye to
the way her colleagues and senior staff have treated her. People have told her
to ‘harden up’, that it ‘comes with the territory’, that she should be quiet
and not draw attention to herself. She has availed herself of the accepted
routes for complaint or raising issues and these have been ignored or pushed
back. She is not leaving science, but she is leaving academia, and academia’s
culture is fully culpable for this. The institution she is leaving needs to
step back and reflect on the organisational culture that has allowed for a toxic
environment both on a local and global level – sexist slides at a faculty
meeting pass without comment, a head of department refuses to speak to a member
their department for more than a year without a single colleague complaining.
I walked to work this morning carrying a cake
box filled with a selection of slices and cakes for a morning tea to farewell a
female PhD student who is heading off overseas for 3 months.
Many of us enact these kinds of acts within
our local academic cultures – trying to embody, with our presence and our
behaviour, a kindness that is sorely lacking within universities (or science,
or academia) as a whole. But I am furious today – does my kindness mean
anything in the face of systemic and personal sexism that seeks to destroy
women and dehumanise men?
Today I’m warmed by my fury – I’m
channelling my tears into action. In writing this, I’m drawing a line. If you
work in academia, in science, especially if you have a management role in a
department or school or centre or institute or faculty, you are responsible for
the culture of that small part of the swirling mass of academic life. You set
the tone.
And if you aren’t actively acknowledging
the systemic and personal and malign and benevolent examples of sexism that
your colleagues are experiencing, if you are not actively working to both
counter those experiences and support those who are living them, then you ARE
the problem.
A woman I know who gives her all for science,
for research, for teaching, for service, for others – she’s leaving because of
all the times you didn’t speak when you should have. All the awkward silences
that were left to fester after an inappropriate comment. All the snide remarks
you didn’t challenge, all the acts of sabotage you witnessed and ignored. You.
Men, women, those who are fortunate enough to have seniority in academia –
remember: everyone here is smart, so distinguish yourself by being kind.
Well said. I left NZ academia largely for these reasons. My biggest disappointment was that my colleagues - supposedly intelligent humans - would have made very good camp guards. It was sexism, it was fascism, and those higher-ups who i shared my perspectives with showed a studied disinterest in doing anything other than rewarding the 'boys'' bad behaviour. I now bring in big research bucks for a non-NZ university, and don't have to deal with the same small minded bs. Sometimes leaving is the only answer when it's that toxic.
ReplyDeleteWell written Kate. It sure reminds me of my own post and my own story http://sciblogs.co.nz/icedoctor/2014/12/09/sexism-shirts-sutton-and-saying-goodbye/
ReplyDeleteWe certainly need to distinguish ourselves by being kind.